Feral Heart

Game & Forum Discussion => Game Discussion => Game Suggestions & Ideas => Topic started by: .General.. on October 04, 2012, 05:58:49 pm

Title: Group ranks
Post by: .General.. on October 04, 2012, 05:58:49 pm
Before anyone starts saying 'oh but then we'd have to get KovuLKD to update the game etc' yes I know. I'm not saying we have to use this, and yes I know Kovu is quite busy and henceforth cannot do much on FH right now. I just wanted to say, it'd be cool /if/ we had this feature. c:

So, do you guys think it'd be awesome to have ranks for the group, say you can have the owner, then some mods for your group. That way, if the owner is busy, mods can still accept people into your group and kick people etc. :3 I think it'd be pretty neat, and handy. I want to know what chu guys think about it. c8
Title: Re: Group ranks
Post by: PrettyReckless on October 04, 2012, 06:01:53 pm
-Resists commenting about Kov updating the game- Hurrdurr.

Yeah it'd be rather cool tbh, at least if it was a possibility to have a co-owner and such for another recruiter. As running a group is rather difficult, keeping it running and all if you're only one person to do all the things.
Sure, there are systems within a group when it comes to recruiting, but sometimes people aren't as patient and you'd loose several members due to the issue.

I do think it's a great idea. x3
Title: Re: Group ranks
Post by: Zaroque on October 04, 2012, 06:09:17 pm
I've always wanted this to be added, it makes life hectic with the system it's currently in.
A lot of these long-term groups have co-administrators and other group owners within just one group, giving power to certain individuals via the group creator needz to be addedz.
Title: Re: Group ranks
Post by: Bluminescent on October 11, 2012, 01:11:17 am
I agree that this would be very useful, but there's a bad side. Suppose you pick a moderator, but they start abusing their privilege by kicking random members and accepting members that aren't eligible for the group.
Title: Re: Group ranks
Post by: awesomelyodd on October 23, 2012, 05:52:26 am
I agree that this would be very useful, but there's a bad side. Suppose you pick a moderator, but they start abusing their privilege by kicking random members and accepting members that aren't eligible for the group.
That is not something that can be considered a "con" to the feature of the group managing system as stated above.... that would be a mistake by the owner for placing that person as a moderator. The owner should only place those he or she trusts and knows can handle the responsibilities.
Title: Re: Group ranks
Post by: Shadow13131 on October 23, 2012, 09:53:37 pm
Maybe just give the moderators the ability to accept, not kick. :3