Should unactive groups on FH get deleted?

[nicekind]

Yeah I think it would be a lovley idea. My opinion on there would be about the group leader. When the group maker hasn't logged on for 6 months the group would be deleted. You guys said 1 month and things like that. It is for me a little bit short time. Maybe something happens. Or you have to go somewhere for a longer time period. Or you just get tired from that group. It would be a horrobile lose if a member who has amazing group but get's tired of the group but redecides after 2 months to return and he/she would have to start everything over again. fOr my opinion 6 months would be a good timeover. But otherwise I love the idea :3
Edit: Ohh this already exsists XD lol well 18 months is really really long timeh but in the same time it is sure that this group woun't be active again

[unnbrellas]

I think 6 months would be a better time, but yes, this is a good idea

[darkknight]

I think this would be a very neat idea to place into the "group" feature.

I think it would be if at least a MEMBER gets on.
Because sometimes, the group leader leaves for a while, but people still RP.

Pretty much sums up what I was going to suggest. Instead of the activity being determined by the leader, alone, it'd be better for to be reflected through all the members. After a selected period of no activity, consistently, then it could simply delete itself.   

[Vespian]

Seeing as most users already stated all that I could possibly say, I do admit, like them, that this is indeed a good factor and could be a nice touch when it comes to groups altogether. Why individuals who fall inactive don't delete their own groups is beyond me, however the reasoning can be various depending on each member. I'm merely intrigued and a bit relieved that, like Ms. Linger has stated, the staff has got it covered for the most part.
Good idea, all in all.